Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Dunlop Winter vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Winter

UltraGrip Performance 3

Number of tests

—

3

1

2

24

Best position

—

#2

#1

Average position

—

3.3

1.0

1.5

2.7

Latest test

—

2026

2025

Available sizes

123

40

64

65

302

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Dunlop Winter

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Dunlop Winter

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Dunlop Winter

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Dunlop Winter

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dunlop Winter

63%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dunlop Winter

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dunlop Winter

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dunlop Winter

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dunlop Winter

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Dunlop Winter

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dunlop Winter

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dunlop Winter

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Dunlop Winter

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dunlop Winter

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Interior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Dunlop Winter vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Winter

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison