Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Number of tests

—

3

23

2

3

Best position

—

#2

#1

#2

Average position

—

3.3

1.0

3.7

Latest test

—

2026

2025

Available sizes

123

40

176

23

34

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry driving behavior

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Interior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison