Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

—

3

5

2

Best position

—

#2

#1

Average position

—

3.3

3.7

2.2

1.0

Latest test

—

2026

2025

Available sizes

123

40

34

63

23

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison