Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Dunlop Winter

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

ION Evo

Winter

Number of tests

—

3

14

1

2

Best position

—

#2

#1

Average position

—

3.3

3.6

1.0

1.5

Latest test

—

2026

2025

Available sizes

123

40

188

64

65

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Dunlop Winter

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

ION Evo

Winter

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison