Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Number of tests

—

18

14

3

23

Best position

—

#1

#4

#1

Average position

—

6.1

3.6

4.3

3.3

Latest test

—

2024

2025

Available sizes

123

47

188

97

176

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Interior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison