Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Upper-middle

Firestone

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip SUV

Roadhawk 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraGrip Performance 3

Number of tests

—

6

18

1

24

Best position

—

#3

#1

Average position

—

4.7

6.1

1.0

2.7

Latest test

—

2026

2024

2025

Available sizes

123

146

47

64

302

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Efficientgrip SUV

Roadhawk 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison