18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
3
3
Best position
#2
#2
Average position
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2025
2026
Available sizes
123
34
60

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison