Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

Winter

9.3

R15 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Efficientgrip SUV

e.Ziex

Winter

Number of tests

—

3

2

Best position

—

#2

#1

Average position

—

3.7

1.5

Latest test

—

2025

Available sizes

123

34

65

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Efficientgrip SUV

e.Ziex

Winter

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison