18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
3
14
1
Best position
#2
#1
#1
Average position
3.7
3.6
1.0
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
123
34
188
64

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison