Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Premium

Dunlop

Winter

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip SUV

Winter

ION Evo

Number of tests

—

2

1

Best position

—

#1

Average position

—

1.5

1.0

Latest test

—

2025

Available sizes

123

65

64

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficientgrip SUV

Winter

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison