Comparison: Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premium

Goodyear

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

R13 – R

VS

Upper-middle

Nokian

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

Line SUV

Advantage

Efficient Grip Performance

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

5

14

16

3

Best position

#1

#2

#8

#3

#2

Average position

2.0

4.2

13.4

5.5

3.3

Latest test

2018

2017

2026

2023

2026

Available sizes

—

33

153

40

Wet

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

90%

Nokian Line SUV

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

75%

Nokian Line SUV

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Wet braking

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

89%

Nokian Line SUV

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

91%

Nokian Line SUV

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

79%

Nokian Line SUV

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Wet handling

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

99%

Nokian Line SUV

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Offroad

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

85%

Dry

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

84%

Nokian Line SUV

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry braking

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

68%

Nokian Line SUV

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry handling

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

100%

Nokian Line SUV

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Costs

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

56%

Nokian Line SUV

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

56%

Nokian Line SUV

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Comfort

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

52%

Nokian Line SUV

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

52%

Nokian Line SUV

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

Line SUV

Advantage

Efficient Grip Performance

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Offroad

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison