Comparison: Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Goodyear

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

R13 – R

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

Primacy 4+

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Number of tests

5

13

18

3

1

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

2.0

4.3

6.1

3.7

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2018

2025

2024

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

123

47

34

40

64

Wet

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

90%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

91%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

79%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

99%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

75%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet braking

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

89%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Offroad

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

85%

Dry

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

84%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

68%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

100%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Costs

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

56%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

56%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Comfort

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

52%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

52%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

Primacy 4+

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Offroad

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison