Comparison: Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Premium

Goodyear

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

R13 – R

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

P ZERO PZ4

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

5

4

3

14

3

Best position

#1

#3

#2

Average position

2.0

12.0

3.3

5.5

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

—

111

40

706

34

60

Wet

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Wet handling

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Wet braking

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Offroad

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

85%

Dry

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Costs

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Comfort

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

52%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

52%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

P ZERO PZ4

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Offroad

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison