18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
5
10
3
1
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
2.0
6.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
34
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Offroad

Offroad
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
85%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
52%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
52%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison