18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
Falken
e.Ziex
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
5
3
15
1
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
2.0
3.7
9.0
1.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
34
225
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
99%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
91%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Offroad

Offroad
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
84%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
68%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
100%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
56%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
56%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
52%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
52%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison