18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
5
3
1
2
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
2.0
3.7
1.0
1.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
34
64
23

Wet

Wet
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Wet braking
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
91%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet handling
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
99%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Offroad

Offroad
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
85%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
84%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
68%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry handling
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
100%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
52%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
52%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
56%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
56%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison