Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Dunlop Winter

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Winter

Number of tests

3

23

3

5

2

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

3.3

4.7

3.3

3.7

2.2

1.5

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

40

126

176

34

63

65

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Interior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Dunlop Winter

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Winter

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison