Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 4+

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

ION Evo

Number of tests

3

13

3

26

1

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

3.3

4.3

3.7

2.2

1.0

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

40

123

34

66

64

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry lane changing

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 4+

74%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Dry steering response

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Michelin Primacy 4+

90%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

96%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Interior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Michelin Primacy 4+

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 4+

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison