Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Cinturato P7 C2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

3

4

5

9

3

1

Best position

#2

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

3.3

12.0

2.2

5.8

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

40

111

63

92

34

64

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

90%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

86%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

87%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Cinturato P7 C2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison