18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
3
3
23
24
3
Best position
#2
#4
#1
#1
#2
Average position
3.3
4.3
3.3
2.7
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
97
176
302
34

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison