Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

3

11

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

3.3

11.6

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2026

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

40

121

60

34

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison