Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Primacy

P ZERO PZ4

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

3

1

4

14

2

Best position

#2

#1

#3

#2

#1

Average position

3.3

1.0

12.0

5.5

1.0

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

40

64

111

706

23

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dry lane changing

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Dry steering response

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Primacy

P ZERO PZ4

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison