Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

3

1

4

5

3

Best position

#2

#1

#3

#1

#2

Average position

3.3

1.0

12.0

2.2

3.3

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

40

64

111

63

60

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison