Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraGrip Performance 3

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

3

1

24

2

Best position

#2

#1

Average position

3.3

1.0

2.7

1.0

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

40

64

302

23

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Wet performance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dry performance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Dry lane changing

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Dry steering response

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Interior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraGrip Performance 3

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison