Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Winter

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

3

23

3

2

26

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

3.3

3.7

1.5

2.2

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

40

176

34

65

66

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Dry steering response

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

96%

Dry lane changing

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Interior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Winter

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison