Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

P Zero (PZ5)

ION Evo

Number of tests

3

18

4

2

1

Best position

#2

#1

#3

#1

Average position

3.3

6.1

12.0

3.0

1.0

Latest test

2026

2024

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

40

47

111

17

64

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

80%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

76%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

64%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

93%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

100%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

92%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

96%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry lane changing

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

92%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

87%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

74%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

77%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

77%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

P Zero (PZ5)

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison