Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

3

18

4

3

Best position

#2

#1

#3

#1

#2

Average position

3.3

6.1

12.0

4.0

3.3

Latest test

2026

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

40

47

111

54

60

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dry lane changing

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison