18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
3
18
4
5
1
2
Best position
#2
#1
#3
#1
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
6.1
12.0
2.2
1.0
1.0
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
47
111
63
64
23

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison