Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

3

18

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

3.3

6.1

3.7

4.0

3.3

Latest test

2026

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

40

47

34

54

60

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dry lane changing

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison