Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance+

Winter

Cinturato (C3)

Number of tests

3

23

2

4

Best position

#2

#1

Average position

3.3

3.7

3.3

1.5

3.3

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

40

34

176

65

—

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry steering response

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Dry lane changing

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Interior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance+

Winter

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison