Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

WinterContact TS 870

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7

R13 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterContact TS 870

WinterCraft WP52+

Number of tests

3

17

3

Best position

#2

#1

#4

Average position

3.3

1.7

4.3

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

40

80

97

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

93%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Dry driving behavior

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

78%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Interior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

98%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterContact TS 870

WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison