18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
3
29
3
24
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
3.7
3.7
2.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
178
34
302

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Wet performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Wet side guide
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
37%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison