18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
3
36
4
3
1
Best position
#2
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
3.1
12.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2026
2023
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
296
111
34
64

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry driving behavior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Fuel efficiency
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison