Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak LM-005

P Zero Winter 2

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Number of tests

3

49

2

3

4

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

3.3

3.2

2.0

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2026

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

40

213

48

34

—

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

13%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry driving behavior

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

81%

Dry performance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

58%

Dry steering response

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry lane changing

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

100%

Interior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak LM-005

P Zero Winter 2

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison