18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.2
R14 – R22
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
3
49
23
3
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
3.3
3.2
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
213
176
34

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry driving behavior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Fuel efficiency
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison