Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

3

14

1

14

5

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

3.3

3.6

1.0

5.5

2.2

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

40

188

64

706

63

Wet

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Aquaplaning - cross

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet circle cornering

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dry

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry performance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Dry lane changing

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

85%

Dry steering response

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

84%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Costs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison