18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Dunlop Winter

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
Dunlop WinterPremium
DunlopDunlop

Winter

9.3
R15 – R21
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
3
14
3
3
2
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#4
#1
Average position
3.3
3.6
3.7
4.3
1.5
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
188
34
97
65

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Wet performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dunlop Winter
78%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison