18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
3
18
1
3
3
3
Best position
#5
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
5.0
4.7
6.1
1.0
3.3
3.7
3.7
Latest test
2024
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
126
47
64
40
34
34

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison