18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
15
1
3
Best position
#5
#2
#1
#2
Average position
5.0
9.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
225
64
34

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison