18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
10
3
Best position
#5
#2
#2
Average position
5.0
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
104
34

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison