18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV vs. Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Goodride
Solmax 1
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
1
18
6
3
3
1
Best position
#5
#8
#1
#3
#2
#2
#1
Average position
5.0
8.0
6.1
4.7
3.3
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2024
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
46
47
146
40
34
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Goodride Solmax 1
49%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Goodride Solmax 1
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Goodride Solmax 1
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Goodride Solmax 1
35%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Goodride Solmax 1
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Goodride Solmax 1
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Goodride Solmax 1
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Goodride Solmax 1
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Goodride Solmax 1
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodride Solmax 1
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodride Solmax 1
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison