Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Compact

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Compact

e.Primacy

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

1

4

1

3

5

Best position

#10

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

10.0

12.0

1.0

3.7

3.3

2.2

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

42

111

64

34

40

60

63

Wet

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

39%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

34%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

43%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Dry

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Costs

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Compact

e.Primacy

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison