Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Compact

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Compact

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

1

4

3

1

3

5

Best position

#10

#3

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

10.0

12.0

3.3

1.0

3.7

3.3

2.2

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

42

111

40

64

34

60

63

Wet

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

39%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

34%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Dry

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Costs

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

43%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Compact

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison