Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Compact

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Compact

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

1

4

3

18

3

2

Best position

#10

#3

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

10.0

12.0

3.3

6.1

3.3

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

42

111

40

47

60

34

23

Wet

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

39%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

34%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Costs

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

43%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dry

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Compact

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison