Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Compact

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Compact

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

1

4

18

1

5

2

3

Best position

#10

#3

#1

#2

Average position

10.0

12.0

6.1

1.0

2.2

1.0

3.3

Latest test

2018

2025

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

42

111

47

64

63

23

40

Wet

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

39%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

34%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

43%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Dry

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Costs

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Compact

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison