Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Compact

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Compact

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

1

4

18

3

26

5

Best position

#10

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

10.0

12.0

6.1

3.3

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2018

2025

2024

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

42

111

47

40

34

66

63

Wet

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

39%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

34%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Dry

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Costs

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

43%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Compact

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison