18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
4
3
2
1
Best position
#10
#3
#2
#1
#1
Average position
10.0
12.0
3.7
1.0
1.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
42
111
34
23
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
39%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison