18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
1
15
1
3
Best position
#10
#2
#1
#2
Average position
10.0
9.0
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
42
225
64
60

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
39%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison