18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 S
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
10
10
3
Best position
#10
#2
#1
#2
Average position
10.0
6.0
2.1
3.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
42
104
195
34

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
39%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
85%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison