Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Compact

R13 – R15

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Compact

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

10

3

Best position

#10

#2

Average position

10.0

6.0

3.7

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

42

104

34

Wet

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

34%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

39%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Costs

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

43%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Compact

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison